modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Four Christian views of what happens after death

Posted on 11:52 PM by Unknown
*

In my (positively prejudiced!) explorations and practices of Mere Christianity - I have noted some sharp differences in the understanding of what happens immediately after death.

Here are brief accounts, necessarily simplistic:

*

1. The Protestant view seems to be that it is at or immediately after the moment of death when the soul is allocated to salvation or judgment.

After that point, nothing can be done to change its ultimate destiny - the final judgment may not be known at this exact point, but it is predestined.

The domain of salvation is restricted to the span of human life.The boundary between time and eternity is the moment of death, and the state of the soul at the moment of transition is therefore permanent and unalterable.

So prayers for the salvation of the dead are at best futile, and at worst a kind of blasphemy - because assuming that human intervention can affect what is between God and the soul of the departed.

*

2. The Eastern Orthodox view seems to be that there is a period of forty days following death during which the soul is evaluated - and during which prayers of the still living may affect this evaluation - then the soul is allocated by the first judgment (awaiting the final judgment).

The domain of salvation extends beyond human life - but is essentially time limited; after which the soul enters eternity, and does not change.

Consequently, prayers for the dead are regarded as necessary, and especially immediately after death.

(The salvific effectuality of later prayers is not ruled-out, but is much less clear.)

*

3. The Roman Catholic view seems to be complex, and I am not sure I have grasped it. After death, most Heaven bound souls require purgatory before Heaven.

There is a strong emphasis on the effectuality of prayers for the dead, but - unlike Orthodoxy - the timing of such prayers  is not critical, and prayer may be retroactive in its effects.

So, the soul is evaluated and purged, and during this process in linear time, the prayers of the living - past, present and future - are all brought to bear on the situation.

The domain of linear time seems to extend beyond the moment of death and to the end of purgatory, at least - which is not a fixed length of time, and perhaps linear time after death is not mapped onto linear time before death; after which the soul enters eternity and does not change.  

*

4. In Mormonism, death is a positive experience of transition to a potentially higher level of exaltation, and necessary to move to the next stage.

Any soul that will consent to be saved (and which has not implicitly rejected salvation by severe and unrepented sin) is evaluated and allocated to its proper place in a multi-level Heaven (or several Heavens); where the possibility of progression upward is open-ended.

In Mormon metaphysics, there is only linear and irreversible time, eternity is simply open ended linear sequential time; so there is no possibility of retroactive prayer being effective - but prayer for the dead may be effective in the sense that there is an 'ongoing process' that may be affected.

**

As the last comment describes, the differences are partly theological and ultimately metaphysical - concerned with time and the nature of eternity.

In some accounts the soul can change its salvific state after death, in other accounts the soul is fixed at death. 

And these differences have a large influence on the nature of Christian practice, and account for many of the most obvious differences between denominations.

For example, when I worship at a Protestant Anglican Church we never pray for the dead; while at Anglo-Catholic Churches we spend a lot of time in prayer for the dead, even in short Masses - and that difference is within a single denomination. 

*
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Leftism cannot be subversive
    * New Leftism, post-mid-sixties Leftism, has been about shaping 'attitudes' - and this leads directly to the Thought Police For Left...
  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Free will entails a plurality of gods
    * By which I mean that free will makes each Man into something very much like the God of the philosophers: an unmoved mover, an uncaused cau...
  • How to make a Patagonian Shakespeare
    ...is the name of a new blog I am intending to work on - with a view to writing a book of that name. http://patagonianshakespeare.blogspot.c...
  • The bass part of music
    * The bass part seems to be liked - even though it is seldom noticed (some unmusical people seem unable to hear it). When the bass comes in,...
  • The Left isn't winning by having good arguments - it wins because people are punished for arguing against the Left
    * This is one of the things I find most frustrating, and increasingly frustrating: not so much that it happens, but that so many people cann...
  • Free will, the torturer and the tortured
    * If free will is real - as it is - then the extreme torturer (and nobody and nothing else) really is responsible for his choice to inflict ...
  • What do 'antipsychotics' do to people?
    * An interesting quote from Robert Whitaker's Anatomy of an Epidemic: magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of ment...
  • Free will implies/ entails pre-mortal existence
    * I find the following line of argument very convincing. Edited, and with bold emphases added, from pages 47-51 of  The God who weeps by Te...
  • Why remain a Church of England Anglican?
    * Given all my nasty (and well-deserved) criticisms of the Church of England, why am I a member? 1. I was baptized into into it, I attended ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ▼  August (57)
      • Natural selection as a coherent religion also requ...
      • What to think of Seamus Heaney?
      • Negativity of a young creative genius - the exampl...
      • If Jehovah is Jesus, then the incarnation may expl...
      • Given that there are grounds for doubt, what shoul...
      • Natural selection as religion
      • Scientific geniuses enabled the destruction of Chr...
      • Deep modern Christian apologetics - psychological ...
      • Five favourite tree species
      • Is Terryl Givens the modern C.S Lewis?
      • If free will really cannot be coerced, ever, by an...
      • Charles Williams and Phyllis Jones - kissing was i...
      • How to be *certain*? It is a matter of love, a mat...
      • Why the Bonferroni correction is a mistake (almost...
      • Falling in love or/and being married
      • Why get married, why have children? The reason mus...
      • What advantages are there to the (deleted) Epilogu...
      • Is creation necessary? What are the intuitions? Mo...
      • The Three Greatest Pirate Captains
      • Shamans and creativity
      • Clarification: it is not about good versus evil pe...
      • It was a perfect title...
      • The traditional Christian concept of marriage is t...
      • Thinking about creative thinking - the external, n...
      • IQ research, the sexual revolution and traditional...
      • My (non-) career as a freelance journalist
      • The appeal of bad art, poetry, music
      • Genius and breakthroughs - a round-up of assumptions
      • Bill Whittle - exemplar of the power but weakness ...
      • Three types of tenor singing Rossini, with varying...
      • Christians against the sexual revolution: sexual s...
      • Creativity: randomness versus inspiration
      • Most modern creatives are evil, overall
      • What is justice?
      • Magicians versus ordinary geniuses
      • An angry God - why not?
      • The concept of Fake Creativity stands close to the...
      • How to be more creative (self-help edition)
      • No such thing as deferred satisfaction - implicati...
      • Christians need to understand God (and in fact do ...
      • Favourite CS Lewis
      • The perils of reaction
      • Why The Master hates Dr Who
      • Harry Potter and the need for a single volume Half...
      • Why I believe creativity is rare - and why it is rare
      • Why hard-working, reliable and sociable people are...
      • Four Christian views of what happens after death
      • What does it *feel* like to be creative?
      • Jesus is Jehovah/ YHWH/ God of the Old Testament
      • What should we do about 'X'?
      • But *everybody* does it...
      • Why I am so wise
      • Immodest dress
      • Mormonism: poised between incredibilities
      • High Psychoticism/ creatives attitude to the churc...
      • Creative people and the churches: Heretics OK, Apo...
      • The troubling acceptability of Eastern Orthodoxy a...
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (39)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile