modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Leftism cannot be subversive

Posted on 12:49 AM by Unknown
*

New Leftism, post-mid-sixties Leftism, has been about shaping 'attitudes' - and this leads directly to the Thought Police

For Leftism it is not sufficient to go along with the ideology, because Leftists know from their own behaviour that this leaves the door wide-open to subversion.

*

Leftists work strategically by feigning compliance to religion, to traditional morality, to beauty and truth; but their private attitudes conflict with with all these, and they work in a thousand - mostly indirect (hence deniable) - ways to subvert, mock, undermine, eventually invert religion, traditional morality, truth and beauty.

*

This is what Leftists do - and they suppose that this is what their opponents do - and this is why Leftists always end-up adopting Thought Police tactics, and persecuting people on the basis of their inferred attitudes - but they are wrong.

*

They are wrong because subversion is destruction, and destruction only works in one direction.

The opponents of Leftism - the true opponents - are constructive, not subversive; builders not destroyers; makers not wreckers. 

The opponents of Leftism cannot use subversion, because there is nothing in Leftism for them to subvert: or, rather, subverting actually-existing Leftism only leads to more extreme and abstract Leftism.

*

So the true opponents of Leftism cannot be strategically and covertly subversive in the way of Leftists; and their private attitudes are irrelevant to their effectiveness; because (unlike subversion) the process of construction, building, making must be, can only be, explicit.

*

This means that the Leftist focus on correct attitudes, and the use of Thought Police tactics to enforce the required attitudes, approaches fairly close to being pure evil - since it is unnecessary, ineffective, a projection - hence in practice an excuse for envy, hatred, cruelty and open-ended destruction of The Good, wherever it may be found or merely suspected to exist.

Of course, this does not in any way serve the interests of Leftists, since they will themselves be consumed by the chaos they foment: but that fact merely confirms (for a Christian) the demonic motivations of Leftism: a hatred of humanity which aims at nothing short of universal and permanent misery.

*
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Hobbit movie review
    * The Hobbit: an unexpected journey - 2012 Rating: three stars (from a possible five).^ * Although Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings m...
  • Observing the Sabbath
    * I was browsing through the Ten Commandments in the Catechism of the Book of Common Prayer, as one does, and noticed the phrase at the end ...
  • What does metaphysics mean in relation to Christianity?
    * Metaphysics is a very interesting subject - doubly so when it interacts with religion. Interesting - and misunderstood. * Metaphysics desc...
  • Favourite period of English history
    * I don't really have a favourite period of English history nowadays - tending to like specific bits and pieces from different eras and ...
  • What happens when we have had *enough* sleep?
    * In my experience, the same dream is recycled with only minor variations. I get stuck in a dream - a dream that repeats with minor variat...
  • Inklings in-jokes in the Notion Club Papers
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/mapping-notion-club-onto-inklings.html *
  • Real understanding versus procedural pseudo-understanding: a collage of sentences
    * The typical modern educated person - by educated I mean someone with advanced educational certification - has zero understanding of comple...
  • William Boyce: a third rate, derivative composer - I like him!
    * William Boyce (1711-1779) was born 26 years after GF Handel, but wrote exactly as if he was Handel; I, at any rate, cannot distinguish the...
  • Omnipotence bleg - and the problem of pain
    * Reading McMurrin's comparative historical analysis of Christian theology (see reference below) was fascinating in many ways - one of w...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ▼  September (22)
      • What is Leftism? Four historical phases
      • What motivates creativity?
      • The social perspective trumps creativity (in most ...
      • C.S Lewis's Trilemma as THE Christian moment
      • Being creative - the basic situation...
      • Spiritual pride and the necessity for theosis
      • What is your favourite Book of the Bible?
      • How much stronger are men than women? (In terms of...
      • An evidence-free world
      • William Boyce: a third rate, derivative composer -...
      • The Gestalt or Essence of the Bible
      • The justice of damnation
      • Parental choice determines mating/ marriage in mos...
      • Sexual dimorphism between men and women is greater...
      • Percentage shares of world populations under polit...
      • The Left isn't winning by having good arguments - ...
      • What is the Christian significance of Charles Will...
      • The 'turning' of heroic literature
      • Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Lef...
      • The dangers of humility under modern conditions
      • The fictional history of The Notion Club Papers - ...
      • Deep apologetics: What blocks repentance? Need for...
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (39)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile