modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, September 7, 2013

How much stronger are men than women? (In terms of maximum muscular strength)

Posted on 11:24 PM by Unknown
*

Question: If an average man competes with a hundred random women in muscle strength tests - how many from that hundred would he expect to beat? 

Answer: All of them.


- Because only about one woman per thousand is stronger than the average man.

(Subject to caveats below)

*

Until a few days ago, I did not realize that the difference between strength in men and women was quite so extreme, so qualitative.

I came across this fact referenced in a review-theory paper about sexual selection: "...less than 10% overlap between the male and female distributions, with 99.9% of females falling below the male mean."

WD Lassek, SJC Gaulin. Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behaviour 2009; 30: 322-328.

*

I checked out their main references. This paper was the most striking: 

RW Bohannon. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  1997; 78: 26-32.

This has tables of muscle strength, with force expressed in Newtons (N) for different movements, men and women, and different age bands, dominant versus non-dominant side.

If we look at the results for dominant arm elbow flexion ('biceps' strength, more or less) - mean force in Newtons plus standard deviation in brackets - we find:

Men        age 20-29 -  285 (38) 
Men        age 70-79 -  237 (40)

Women age 20-29 -   155 (21)
Women age 70-79 -   130 (27)

And similar results are found for other muscle groups.

* 
 
What is striking is that at 20-29 the difference in average strength is 285 - 155, which is 130 Newtons difference - or that, in round numbers, men are nearly twice as strong as women. (ie. 130 is nearly as big as 155)

And the standard deviation for women is just 21 - which means that there are about six standard deviations difference, which is a huge difference and means near zero chance of overlap in strengths between men and women.

Indeed, the Men aged 70-79 were much stronger than the women aged 20-29: 237 - 155 = 82 Newtons, which means old men are still roughly half as strong again as women (i.e. 82 is about half of 155) - or young women are only about two thirds as strong as old men.

*

Now, these numbers are presented as reference values; but like almost all real-life reference values they are not truly representative of the general population, because they are (and this is clearly acknowledged in the methods section) based on a 'convenience sample' of 106 men and 125 women selected on the basis of different ages. And these subjects are not athletes in training, body-builders, or anything of that sort.

Since subjects had to go to a lab and perform strenuous tests - this sample would include only volunteers; and exclude those too ill to come to the lab or too lazy to make the exertions.

This could be significant - for example, a high proportion of men aged 70-79 would be unable to do these tests (being too ill, demented, institutionalized, or whatever) - so the reference value at best refers to that subset of ambulant old men able and willing to do these lab tests.

*

Nonetheless, the take-home message is clear: the statement "men are much stronger than women" is not just true on average, but is close to being true as a generalization (at least among un-trained subjects).

I have tried this fact out on a few people, men and women, and most - like me - were surprised at the high degree of difference in strength between men and women and especially the lack of overlap.

Since the average civilized men and women do not compete physically at full strength in the course of everyday life, and seldom go head to head on the kind of objective measures of strength being used here, the scale of sex differences in strength is consistently under-estimated - probably due to the factors discussed here:

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/sexual-dimorphism-between-men-and-women.html

*
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Hobbit movie review
    * The Hobbit: an unexpected journey - 2012 Rating: three stars (from a possible five).^ * Although Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings m...
  • Observing the Sabbath
    * I was browsing through the Ten Commandments in the Catechism of the Book of Common Prayer, as one does, and noticed the phrase at the end ...
  • What does metaphysics mean in relation to Christianity?
    * Metaphysics is a very interesting subject - doubly so when it interacts with religion. Interesting - and misunderstood. * Metaphysics desc...
  • Favourite period of English history
    * I don't really have a favourite period of English history nowadays - tending to like specific bits and pieces from different eras and ...
  • What happens when we have had *enough* sleep?
    * In my experience, the same dream is recycled with only minor variations. I get stuck in a dream - a dream that repeats with minor variat...
  • Inklings in-jokes in the Notion Club Papers
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/mapping-notion-club-onto-inklings.html *
  • Real understanding versus procedural pseudo-understanding: a collage of sentences
    * The typical modern educated person - by educated I mean someone with advanced educational certification - has zero understanding of comple...
  • William Boyce: a third rate, derivative composer - I like him!
    * William Boyce (1711-1779) was born 26 years after GF Handel, but wrote exactly as if he was Handel; I, at any rate, cannot distinguish the...
  • Omnipotence bleg - and the problem of pain
    * Reading McMurrin's comparative historical analysis of Christian theology (see reference below) was fascinating in many ways - one of w...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ▼  September (22)
      • What is Leftism? Four historical phases
      • What motivates creativity?
      • The social perspective trumps creativity (in most ...
      • C.S Lewis's Trilemma as THE Christian moment
      • Being creative - the basic situation...
      • Spiritual pride and the necessity for theosis
      • What is your favourite Book of the Bible?
      • How much stronger are men than women? (In terms of...
      • An evidence-free world
      • William Boyce: a third rate, derivative composer -...
      • The Gestalt or Essence of the Bible
      • The justice of damnation
      • Parental choice determines mating/ marriage in mos...
      • Sexual dimorphism between men and women is greater...
      • Percentage shares of world populations under polit...
      • The Left isn't winning by having good arguments - ...
      • What is the Christian significance of Charles Will...
      • The 'turning' of heroic literature
      • Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Lef...
      • The dangers of humility under modern conditions
      • The fictional history of The Notion Club Papers - ...
      • Deep apologetics: What blocks repentance? Need for...
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (39)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile