modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Falling in love or/and being married

Posted on 11:26 PM by Unknown
*

Secular culture does an accurate job of depicting what it is like to fall in love, that delightful and painful state - indeed it does this to the point of tedium and way beyond.

But secular culture uses falling in love as a weapon against being married - as if it was a case of falling in love versus being married.

*

By contrast, secular culture does a very poor job of depicting what it is like to be married.

Secular culture fails and fails to depict the reality of marriage.

Indeed it does the opposite of failing, it successfully depicts marriage as the fading of the in-love state, as an impediment to falling in love; as at best cozy companionship and fun with kinds but at worst prolonged boredom and torment - in a word secualr culture depicts marriage purely as a material state.

*

So, secularism depicts falling in love as a spiritual state, THE spiritual state (one and only, the only self-justifying thing) but being married as an ANTI-spiritual state.

*

How strange (if it were not deliberately evil) that secular culture actually is (non-specifically, but assertively and un-boundedly) spiritual, when it comes to falling in love - yet so aggressively anti-spiritual about being married!

*

Christians ought to do better - and real Christians generally do DO better in practice - but the spirituality of marriage remains private (as it should, as a rule).

But the proper privacy of specific real spiritual marriage is compatible with the necessity for public depictions of the spirituality of marriage - marriage as an 'artistic' thing (artistic in the sense of real - really real!- but not autobiographical).

*

Why are they not more cultural depictions of the spirituality of marriage - of being married?

(I use the term spirituality to refer to the highest things, the most desired things, the things that produce the deepest and most lasting happiness).

The answer is obvious - because secular culture wants to destroy marriage.

*

But why are there not more, a lot more, Christian depictions of the spirituality of marriage? We need them.

Why don't more Christian churches set themselves up to help their young people marry, and marry well? Surely it ought to be a major priority? Surely it ought to be discussed from the pulpit and at the highest level?

To hear pro-marriage discourse from a church leader is sometimes like attending a social policy lecture, or a political speech - where in all this is the spirituality of marriage?

*

Where is the depiction of ideal marriage as a high and also profound path to God, offering glimpses of Heaven on earth, the family as a microcosm of the church and the human condition - a discussion of the potentially eternal consequences of marriage and family such that its delights do not fade but are forever, yet its sufferings are healed?

*

Everybody knows - because public discourse is full of it - that falling in love really is delightful, life-enhancing, self-validating and the rest of it - despite that it is also a state of torment, jealousy, disgust, despair and the rest of it.

Hardly anybody knows - because it is not in public discourse - that being married and having a family really is all of this, but more so.

*
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Leftism cannot be subversive
    * New Leftism, post-mid-sixties Leftism, has been about shaping 'attitudes' - and this leads directly to the Thought Police For Left...
  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Free will entails a plurality of gods
    * By which I mean that free will makes each Man into something very much like the God of the philosophers: an unmoved mover, an uncaused cau...
  • How to make a Patagonian Shakespeare
    ...is the name of a new blog I am intending to work on - with a view to writing a book of that name. http://patagonianshakespeare.blogspot.c...
  • The bass part of music
    * The bass part seems to be liked - even though it is seldom noticed (some unmusical people seem unable to hear it). When the bass comes in,...
  • The Left isn't winning by having good arguments - it wins because people are punished for arguing against the Left
    * This is one of the things I find most frustrating, and increasingly frustrating: not so much that it happens, but that so many people cann...
  • Free will, the torturer and the tortured
    * If free will is real - as it is - then the extreme torturer (and nobody and nothing else) really is responsible for his choice to inflict ...
  • What do 'antipsychotics' do to people?
    * An interesting quote from Robert Whitaker's Anatomy of an Epidemic: magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of ment...
  • Free will implies/ entails pre-mortal existence
    * I find the following line of argument very convincing. Edited, and with bold emphases added, from pages 47-51 of  The God who weeps by Te...
  • Why remain a Church of England Anglican?
    * Given all my nasty (and well-deserved) criticisms of the Church of England, why am I a member? 1. I was baptized into into it, I attended ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ▼  August (57)
      • Natural selection as a coherent religion also requ...
      • What to think of Seamus Heaney?
      • Negativity of a young creative genius - the exampl...
      • If Jehovah is Jesus, then the incarnation may expl...
      • Given that there are grounds for doubt, what shoul...
      • Natural selection as religion
      • Scientific geniuses enabled the destruction of Chr...
      • Deep modern Christian apologetics - psychological ...
      • Five favourite tree species
      • Is Terryl Givens the modern C.S Lewis?
      • If free will really cannot be coerced, ever, by an...
      • Charles Williams and Phyllis Jones - kissing was i...
      • How to be *certain*? It is a matter of love, a mat...
      • Why the Bonferroni correction is a mistake (almost...
      • Falling in love or/and being married
      • Why get married, why have children? The reason mus...
      • What advantages are there to the (deleted) Epilogu...
      • Is creation necessary? What are the intuitions? Mo...
      • The Three Greatest Pirate Captains
      • Shamans and creativity
      • Clarification: it is not about good versus evil pe...
      • It was a perfect title...
      • The traditional Christian concept of marriage is t...
      • Thinking about creative thinking - the external, n...
      • IQ research, the sexual revolution and traditional...
      • My (non-) career as a freelance journalist
      • The appeal of bad art, poetry, music
      • Genius and breakthroughs - a round-up of assumptions
      • Bill Whittle - exemplar of the power but weakness ...
      • Three types of tenor singing Rossini, with varying...
      • Christians against the sexual revolution: sexual s...
      • Creativity: randomness versus inspiration
      • Most modern creatives are evil, overall
      • What is justice?
      • Magicians versus ordinary geniuses
      • An angry God - why not?
      • The concept of Fake Creativity stands close to the...
      • How to be more creative (self-help edition)
      • No such thing as deferred satisfaction - implicati...
      • Christians need to understand God (and in fact do ...
      • Favourite CS Lewis
      • The perils of reaction
      • Why The Master hates Dr Who
      • Harry Potter and the need for a single volume Half...
      • Why I believe creativity is rare - and why it is rare
      • Why hard-working, reliable and sociable people are...
      • Four Christian views of what happens after death
      • What does it *feel* like to be creative?
      • Jesus is Jehovah/ YHWH/ God of the Old Testament
      • What should we do about 'X'?
      • But *everybody* does it...
      • Why I am so wise
      • Immodest dress
      • Mormonism: poised between incredibilities
      • High Psychoticism/ creatives attitude to the churc...
      • Creative people and the churches: Heretics OK, Apo...
      • The troubling acceptability of Eastern Orthodoxy a...
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (39)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile