modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Immodest dress

Posted on 11:16 PM by Unknown
*

Immodest dress is all-but universal in England today. It has been a fact of life since I was a child - but has increased in scope so that it is now near-universal among the married as well as the unmarried, the middle aged and elderly as well as the young.

This exceptionally hot British summer has provided a display arena for grossly immodest dress. It really is hard to exaggerate the strength of this phenomenon.

That hot weather is an excuse not a reason for immodest dress is seen by the fact that among the few significant exceptions to the immodest rule are some recent immigrants, especially among those from some of the hottest countries where they know that the best way to deal with sun and warmth is coverage by large swathes of loose clothing, and not by the minimum legal area of extremely tight fabric.

*

An added factor this year has been the combination of gross immodesty with the by-now near ubiquity of tattooing, and of an extremity that until recently ago would have been seen only in the seediest kind of circuses and fun fairs or among weird and narcissistic cults.

Another novelty suddenly grown to be normal is those men, of all ages and classes, who will - at every opportunity - blatantly display the consequences of their steroid-amped body building - apparently to intimidate other males, to attract females, and vice versa.

*

The combination of extreme ubiquitous immodesty with extreme tattooing and chemically-chiseled bodies, demonstrate that we are in new cultural territory - where signals of sexual availability are used aggressively to grab casual attention in public space; then cutaneous self-defacement serves to transfix this attention.

This assault on the senses, the combination of hyper-psuedo-sexualization with graffiti vandalism of the human form, would provoke either catatonic stupor or violent riots in most of the world  - yet in modern secular England it has been normalised into everyday reality on the streets, in the media, in shops and entertainments, almost everywhere... with terrifying swiftness and ease and near-zero opposition.

The pathetic weakness of secular common sense is here shown with graphic reality - common decency has been utterly powerless in the face of a decades long, cumulative orgy of the sexual revolution among successive me-generations.

Only devout religious adherents have, as a group, held their ground.  

*

Seriously, what can be expected of a populace whose individuals, en masse, present themselves in such a way?

Who eagerly embrace and advertise and boast of every next incremental step in their own public degradation; whose personal existence and form has been self-engineered into a permanent assault on common sense and religious sensibility?

And where this whole process is gloatingly documented and promoted by the mass media, perhaps most especially and most deviously in the highbrow mass media and among the intellectuals. 

What does a society of such persons deserve?

*

The group exceptions to this proudly-displayed-degeneration are all-but confined to the highly religious, and immigrant communities.

Indeed the contrast between the public presentation of religious immigrants and the mainstream secular Britons is overwhelming obvious; almost a parodic confirmation of the correctness of accusations of gross Western decadence (and a powerful, probably conclusive, refutation of anybody's nationalist, or even patriotic, hopes for regeneration and renewal of the UK culture and politics).

Any slender basis for avoiding the gathering self-destructive mass-suicide of the West is confined to Christian individuals and groups who shun this mainstream culture of attention-seeking-self-defacement.

And this group are a tiny minority, and not powerful, and increasingly despised and persecuted.

*

Having seen the rapidity and extremity of self-degradation of the past decades,  it would be a brave man who assumed that we have reached rock bottom: presumably the next step is that immodest behaviour in the public arena will move-on from where immodest dress leaves-off...

Best not to think about it: why try to anticipate? Sufficient unto this day are the evils thereof.

*
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Leftism cannot be subversive
    * New Leftism, post-mid-sixties Leftism, has been about shaping 'attitudes' - and this leads directly to the Thought Police For Left...
  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Free will entails a plurality of gods
    * By which I mean that free will makes each Man into something very much like the God of the philosophers: an unmoved mover, an uncaused cau...
  • How to make a Patagonian Shakespeare
    ...is the name of a new blog I am intending to work on - with a view to writing a book of that name. http://patagonianshakespeare.blogspot.c...
  • The bass part of music
    * The bass part seems to be liked - even though it is seldom noticed (some unmusical people seem unable to hear it). When the bass comes in,...
  • The Left isn't winning by having good arguments - it wins because people are punished for arguing against the Left
    * This is one of the things I find most frustrating, and increasingly frustrating: not so much that it happens, but that so many people cann...
  • Free will, the torturer and the tortured
    * If free will is real - as it is - then the extreme torturer (and nobody and nothing else) really is responsible for his choice to inflict ...
  • What do 'antipsychotics' do to people?
    * An interesting quote from Robert Whitaker's Anatomy of an Epidemic: magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of ment...
  • Free will implies/ entails pre-mortal existence
    * I find the following line of argument very convincing. Edited, and with bold emphases added, from pages 47-51 of  The God who weeps by Te...
  • Why remain a Church of England Anglican?
    * Given all my nasty (and well-deserved) criticisms of the Church of England, why am I a member? 1. I was baptized into into it, I attended ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ▼  August (57)
      • Natural selection as a coherent religion also requ...
      • What to think of Seamus Heaney?
      • Negativity of a young creative genius - the exampl...
      • If Jehovah is Jesus, then the incarnation may expl...
      • Given that there are grounds for doubt, what shoul...
      • Natural selection as religion
      • Scientific geniuses enabled the destruction of Chr...
      • Deep modern Christian apologetics - psychological ...
      • Five favourite tree species
      • Is Terryl Givens the modern C.S Lewis?
      • If free will really cannot be coerced, ever, by an...
      • Charles Williams and Phyllis Jones - kissing was i...
      • How to be *certain*? It is a matter of love, a mat...
      • Why the Bonferroni correction is a mistake (almost...
      • Falling in love or/and being married
      • Why get married, why have children? The reason mus...
      • What advantages are there to the (deleted) Epilogu...
      • Is creation necessary? What are the intuitions? Mo...
      • The Three Greatest Pirate Captains
      • Shamans and creativity
      • Clarification: it is not about good versus evil pe...
      • It was a perfect title...
      • The traditional Christian concept of marriage is t...
      • Thinking about creative thinking - the external, n...
      • IQ research, the sexual revolution and traditional...
      • My (non-) career as a freelance journalist
      • The appeal of bad art, poetry, music
      • Genius and breakthroughs - a round-up of assumptions
      • Bill Whittle - exemplar of the power but weakness ...
      • Three types of tenor singing Rossini, with varying...
      • Christians against the sexual revolution: sexual s...
      • Creativity: randomness versus inspiration
      • Most modern creatives are evil, overall
      • What is justice?
      • Magicians versus ordinary geniuses
      • An angry God - why not?
      • The concept of Fake Creativity stands close to the...
      • How to be more creative (self-help edition)
      • No such thing as deferred satisfaction - implicati...
      • Christians need to understand God (and in fact do ...
      • Favourite CS Lewis
      • The perils of reaction
      • Why The Master hates Dr Who
      • Harry Potter and the need for a single volume Half...
      • Why I believe creativity is rare - and why it is rare
      • Why hard-working, reliable and sociable people are...
      • Four Christian views of what happens after death
      • What does it *feel* like to be creative?
      • Jesus is Jehovah/ YHWH/ God of the Old Testament
      • What should we do about 'X'?
      • But *everybody* does it...
      • Why I am so wise
      • Immodest dress
      • Mormonism: poised between incredibilities
      • High Psychoticism/ creatives attitude to the churc...
      • Creative people and the churches: Heretics OK, Apo...
      • The troubling acceptability of Eastern Orthodoxy a...
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (39)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile