modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Mormonism: poised between incredibilities

Posted on 12:31 AM by Unknown
*

Incredible: 1b - Hard to believe. New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary

**

It strikes me that Mormonism is an incredible religion, in the two-sided sense that it both hard to believe and hard not to believe!

I realize that to most non-Mormons this is untrue - in the sense that they find Mormonism one-sidedly hard to believe and easy to disbelieve - hard to accept and extremely easy to dismiss.

But, when not due to sheer ignorance, that attitude is often due to them being blinded by negative prejudice; because there are remarkable facts about Mormonism which it is hard to believe are not due to its being true.

There are at least four two-sidedly incredible aspects of Mormonism - that is they are both hard to believe, and hard not to believe.

*

1. Joseph Smith.

On the one hand, it is hard to believe that such an ordinary and flawed person as Joseph Smith should have been a prophet of God; on the other hand it is hard to believe that anybody except a prophet of God could have done what he did.

2. The book of Mormon

On the one hand, the convoluted story of how the book of Mormon came to be written is bizarre, unprecedented - in a word incredible; on the other hand, it is very hard to believe that a book of such length, quality, complexity could have been dictated verbatim and unrevised in extremely difficult conditions and in just a few months.

3. The organization of the LDS church

On the one hand, the piecemeal emergence of the Mormon church, the adoption of elements from various traditions, the revisions and corrections of doctrine and so on - all seem like ad hoc improvisations and strain credibility; on the other hand, the results were incredible: a church which commanded great strength and devoutness and expanded exponentially for 180 years and successfully scaled up from a few hundreds to many millions.

4. Mormon theology

Contradicts so much of the theology of the historical Christian church, and so profoundly, that it is very hard to believe that almost all Christians could have been so wrong about so many things for such a long time; on the other hand, the Mormon theology is so simple, systematic and also Biblically coherent that it is incredible that Christians could have failed to discover it for so many centuries.

**

I could go on - but I hope the point has been made that if Mormonism is given its due, then incredibilities abound, and are rather exactly poised!

It is incredible that something as incredible as Mormonism could be true: it is also incredible that something as coherent, as long-term successful, and as good as Mormonism could be false.

*

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Hobbit movie review
    * The Hobbit: an unexpected journey - 2012 Rating: three stars (from a possible five).^ * Although Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings m...
  • Observing the Sabbath
    * I was browsing through the Ten Commandments in the Catechism of the Book of Common Prayer, as one does, and noticed the phrase at the end ...
  • What does metaphysics mean in relation to Christianity?
    * Metaphysics is a very interesting subject - doubly so when it interacts with religion. Interesting - and misunderstood. * Metaphysics desc...
  • Favourite period of English history
    * I don't really have a favourite period of English history nowadays - tending to like specific bits and pieces from different eras and ...
  • What happens when we have had *enough* sleep?
    * In my experience, the same dream is recycled with only minor variations. I get stuck in a dream - a dream that repeats with minor variat...
  • Inklings in-jokes in the Notion Club Papers
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/mapping-notion-club-onto-inklings.html *
  • Real understanding versus procedural pseudo-understanding: a collage of sentences
    * The typical modern educated person - by educated I mean someone with advanced educational certification - has zero understanding of comple...
  • William Boyce: a third rate, derivative composer - I like him!
    * William Boyce (1711-1779) was born 26 years after GF Handel, but wrote exactly as if he was Handel; I, at any rate, cannot distinguish the...
  • Omnipotence bleg - and the problem of pain
    * Reading McMurrin's comparative historical analysis of Christian theology (see reference below) was fascinating in many ways - one of w...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ▼  August (57)
      • Natural selection as a coherent religion also requ...
      • What to think of Seamus Heaney?
      • Negativity of a young creative genius - the exampl...
      • If Jehovah is Jesus, then the incarnation may expl...
      • Given that there are grounds for doubt, what shoul...
      • Natural selection as religion
      • Scientific geniuses enabled the destruction of Chr...
      • Deep modern Christian apologetics - psychological ...
      • Five favourite tree species
      • Is Terryl Givens the modern C.S Lewis?
      • If free will really cannot be coerced, ever, by an...
      • Charles Williams and Phyllis Jones - kissing was i...
      • How to be *certain*? It is a matter of love, a mat...
      • Why the Bonferroni correction is a mistake (almost...
      • Falling in love or/and being married
      • Why get married, why have children? The reason mus...
      • What advantages are there to the (deleted) Epilogu...
      • Is creation necessary? What are the intuitions? Mo...
      • The Three Greatest Pirate Captains
      • Shamans and creativity
      • Clarification: it is not about good versus evil pe...
      • It was a perfect title...
      • The traditional Christian concept of marriage is t...
      • Thinking about creative thinking - the external, n...
      • IQ research, the sexual revolution and traditional...
      • My (non-) career as a freelance journalist
      • The appeal of bad art, poetry, music
      • Genius and breakthroughs - a round-up of assumptions
      • Bill Whittle - exemplar of the power but weakness ...
      • Three types of tenor singing Rossini, with varying...
      • Christians against the sexual revolution: sexual s...
      • Creativity: randomness versus inspiration
      • Most modern creatives are evil, overall
      • What is justice?
      • Magicians versus ordinary geniuses
      • An angry God - why not?
      • The concept of Fake Creativity stands close to the...
      • How to be more creative (self-help edition)
      • No such thing as deferred satisfaction - implicati...
      • Christians need to understand God (and in fact do ...
      • Favourite CS Lewis
      • The perils of reaction
      • Why The Master hates Dr Who
      • Harry Potter and the need for a single volume Half...
      • Why I believe creativity is rare - and why it is rare
      • Why hard-working, reliable and sociable people are...
      • Four Christian views of what happens after death
      • What does it *feel* like to be creative?
      • Jesus is Jehovah/ YHWH/ God of the Old Testament
      • What should we do about 'X'?
      • But *everybody* does it...
      • Why I am so wise
      • Immodest dress
      • Mormonism: poised between incredibilities
      • High Psychoticism/ creatives attitude to the churc...
      • Creative people and the churches: Heretics OK, Apo...
      • The troubling acceptability of Eastern Orthodoxy a...
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (39)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile