modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, August 2, 2013

High Psychoticism/ creatives attitude to the church (and other institutions)

Posted on 10:35 PM by Unknown
*

Yesterday I posted about the church attitude to creatives - what of the opposite?

Again there are no rules - but the problem can be clarified.

*

The main problem of the creative with high Psychoticism is probably ego - the ego of the creative is naturally and necessarily strong.

The strong ego can be undermined or crushed, but at a heavy cost - the cost of destroying creativity. So this is not the right path.

*

The principle is: creativity (potentially) good, therefore strong ego (potentially) good.

BUT a strong ego does not - not at all! - imply entitlement to status, power, influence - and in the context of the difficulties presented by a high Psychoticism personality, then the attitude of the creative ought to be one of seeking a niche in an institution, a niche where he is tolerated and able to do his work.

(Rather than attempting to transform the institution to optimize his own peculiar nature and needs, or attempting to harvest special rewards or a privileged position.)

*

To summarize the summary: the attitude of a creative is to find a church he can respect: therefore a strong church, 'orthodox', traditional, conservative etc; yet church which also tolerates him specifically - tolerates to the extent of not trying to mould him into a different, and not-creative, semi-person.

Such tolerance will usually be ad hoc and unsystematic and by a specific church leader - tolerance in practice rather than according to theory.

And the creative needs to accept that this is all he can reasonably expect - to be allowed a niche and to be shielded from the normal consequences of his personality - because if the tolerance extended to difficult cases such as himself was made a matter of regulation and routine, then the church (or any other institution) would collapse.

*

To summarize the summary: one common problem of a strong ego is the sense of entitlement, which leads to resentment; therefore the antidote to excessive ego is gratitude, and gratitude leads to loyalty - which is what the church requires of its creatives.

In a nutshell: creatives who are in an institutional situation where they are being allowed to be creative should count their blessings!

*
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Hobbit movie review
    * The Hobbit: an unexpected journey - 2012 Rating: three stars (from a possible five).^ * Although Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings m...
  • Observing the Sabbath
    * I was browsing through the Ten Commandments in the Catechism of the Book of Common Prayer, as one does, and noticed the phrase at the end ...
  • What does metaphysics mean in relation to Christianity?
    * Metaphysics is a very interesting subject - doubly so when it interacts with religion. Interesting - and misunderstood. * Metaphysics desc...
  • Favourite period of English history
    * I don't really have a favourite period of English history nowadays - tending to like specific bits and pieces from different eras and ...
  • What happens when we have had *enough* sleep?
    * In my experience, the same dream is recycled with only minor variations. I get stuck in a dream - a dream that repeats with minor variat...
  • Inklings in-jokes in the Notion Club Papers
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/mapping-notion-club-onto-inklings.html *
  • Real understanding versus procedural pseudo-understanding: a collage of sentences
    * The typical modern educated person - by educated I mean someone with advanced educational certification - has zero understanding of comple...
  • William Boyce: a third rate, derivative composer - I like him!
    * William Boyce (1711-1779) was born 26 years after GF Handel, but wrote exactly as if he was Handel; I, at any rate, cannot distinguish the...
  • Omnipotence bleg - and the problem of pain
    * Reading McMurrin's comparative historical analysis of Christian theology (see reference below) was fascinating in many ways - one of w...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ▼  August (57)
      • Natural selection as a coherent religion also requ...
      • What to think of Seamus Heaney?
      • Negativity of a young creative genius - the exampl...
      • If Jehovah is Jesus, then the incarnation may expl...
      • Given that there are grounds for doubt, what shoul...
      • Natural selection as religion
      • Scientific geniuses enabled the destruction of Chr...
      • Deep modern Christian apologetics - psychological ...
      • Five favourite tree species
      • Is Terryl Givens the modern C.S Lewis?
      • If free will really cannot be coerced, ever, by an...
      • Charles Williams and Phyllis Jones - kissing was i...
      • How to be *certain*? It is a matter of love, a mat...
      • Why the Bonferroni correction is a mistake (almost...
      • Falling in love or/and being married
      • Why get married, why have children? The reason mus...
      • What advantages are there to the (deleted) Epilogu...
      • Is creation necessary? What are the intuitions? Mo...
      • The Three Greatest Pirate Captains
      • Shamans and creativity
      • Clarification: it is not about good versus evil pe...
      • It was a perfect title...
      • The traditional Christian concept of marriage is t...
      • Thinking about creative thinking - the external, n...
      • IQ research, the sexual revolution and traditional...
      • My (non-) career as a freelance journalist
      • The appeal of bad art, poetry, music
      • Genius and breakthroughs - a round-up of assumptions
      • Bill Whittle - exemplar of the power but weakness ...
      • Three types of tenor singing Rossini, with varying...
      • Christians against the sexual revolution: sexual s...
      • Creativity: randomness versus inspiration
      • Most modern creatives are evil, overall
      • What is justice?
      • Magicians versus ordinary geniuses
      • An angry God - why not?
      • The concept of Fake Creativity stands close to the...
      • How to be more creative (self-help edition)
      • No such thing as deferred satisfaction - implicati...
      • Christians need to understand God (and in fact do ...
      • Favourite CS Lewis
      • The perils of reaction
      • Why The Master hates Dr Who
      • Harry Potter and the need for a single volume Half...
      • Why I believe creativity is rare - and why it is rare
      • Why hard-working, reliable and sociable people are...
      • Four Christian views of what happens after death
      • What does it *feel* like to be creative?
      • Jesus is Jehovah/ YHWH/ God of the Old Testament
      • What should we do about 'X'?
      • But *everybody* does it...
      • Why I am so wise
      • Immodest dress
      • Mormonism: poised between incredibilities
      • High Psychoticism/ creatives attitude to the churc...
      • Creative people and the churches: Heretics OK, Apo...
      • The troubling acceptability of Eastern Orthodoxy a...
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (39)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile