modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, March 4, 2013

The analgesic properties of tubular elastic bandages

Posted on 2:51 AM by Unknown
*

I have previously mentioned that I am somewhat plagued by osteoarthritis (mostly) in the knees - and the main problem is pain; and the main problem with this pain is that due to side effects (and side effects of the drugs used to combat these side effects) I cannot take any of the effective analgesics (NSAIDs or Aspirin).

The only effective and tolerable analgesic that I have so far discovered is to wear 'tubigrip' - tubular elasticated bandages - around the knee joints...

(and extending down to the ankle, to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis if I was to have only knee bandages constricting blood supply above the calf).

*

These tubigrip bandages offer substantial analgesic benefits (i.e. they significantly reduce pain both at rest and when walking), and do so instantly (as soon as the bandages are applied) - which implies that, to be so rapid, the analgesic effect must be via nerves and not (for example) by reducing-swelling or providing support to the joint.

*

The likely mechanism by which tubigrip bandages work is by counter-irritation, or the Gate Theory - in other words the tubular bandages stimulate superficial touch receptors in the skin (which have rapid-conducting, myelinated nerve fibres); and these skin sensations then block (or gate) the more slowly-conducting (unmyelinated fibres) pain stimuli from within the knee joint.

The principle is the same as rubbing a limb - quickly and lightly - which you have just bumped and which you know will start to hurt in a couple of seconds time. But if you can start rubbing the skin over the injury immediately, then the touch sensation will travel faster to the central nervous system than the pain sensation (because the myelinated touch fibres beat the unmyelinated pain fibres); and therefore the pain is, to some extent, blocked and reduced. 

*

I have in fact been using tubular bandages on sore joints, including elbows, wrists and ankles, for many years - but used to suppose that they worked by giving support and reducing swelling.

If bandages worked by increasing joint-support and reducing swelling, this would predict that stronger and more compressive bandages would be more effective that lighter and less compressive bandages.

However, I have found the lighter and less-compressive bandages to be more effective (as well as more comfortable). Thus my assumption that the counter-irritation Gate Theory is most likely.

*

If I am correct about the analgesic mechanism of tubigrip bandages, then the principle could be applied to devise other methods of touch receptor stimulation as an analgesic manoeuvre to treat joint pain; from topical agents (creams) that produce some kind of 'irritation'/ stimulation, perhaps temperature change, perhaps transcutaneous electric stimulation?



Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Leftism cannot be subversive
    * New Leftism, post-mid-sixties Leftism, has been about shaping 'attitudes' - and this leads directly to the Thought Police For Left...
  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Free will entails a plurality of gods
    * By which I mean that free will makes each Man into something very much like the God of the philosophers: an unmoved mover, an uncaused cau...
  • How to make a Patagonian Shakespeare
    ...is the name of a new blog I am intending to work on - with a view to writing a book of that name. http://patagonianshakespeare.blogspot.c...
  • The bass part of music
    * The bass part seems to be liked - even though it is seldom noticed (some unmusical people seem unable to hear it). When the bass comes in,...
  • The Left isn't winning by having good arguments - it wins because people are punished for arguing against the Left
    * This is one of the things I find most frustrating, and increasingly frustrating: not so much that it happens, but that so many people cann...
  • Free will, the torturer and the tortured
    * If free will is real - as it is - then the extreme torturer (and nobody and nothing else) really is responsible for his choice to inflict ...
  • What do 'antipsychotics' do to people?
    * An interesting quote from Robert Whitaker's Anatomy of an Epidemic: magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of ment...
  • Free will implies/ entails pre-mortal existence
    * I find the following line of argument very convincing. Edited, and with bold emphases added, from pages 47-51 of  The God who weeps by Te...
  • Why remain a Church of England Anglican?
    * Given all my nasty (and well-deserved) criticisms of the Church of England, why am I a member? 1. I was baptized into into it, I attended ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ▼  March (51)
      • Argument with Leftists is like telling Nazis that ...
      • Is it that God will not make us enter Heaven, or c...
      • Favourite period of English history
      • Free will entails a plurality of gods
      • Snow, snail, snil, snoil, hail
      • Can you handle it?
      • Marshall McLuhan's (one) Big Idea
      • The perils of prolonged dating (and cohabitation)
      • Pragmatism and religion
      • Wildly inaccurate fantasy cover art
      • If you are not religious, you are a sex-addict
      • The ideal truth about family life
      • The remarkable thing that is free will
      • Welby-watch - enthronement speech. What is an 'eva...
      • Have the ranks of the high-IQ Outsiders been swell...
      • My innate pragmatism and pluralism twangs-back...
      • Potter versus Rowling
      • Mere Christianity - losing faith in the power of t...
      • The Christian Evolutionist
      • The comment that threw into doubt my previous idea...
      • What is the purpose of the discourse of the biolog...
      • God's power
      • Free will, the torturer and the tortured
      • Charles Williams on the implications of God's omni...
      • Natural selection: its power and its limitations
      • Inklings in-jokes in the Notion Club Papers
      • What does natural selection operate upon?
      • Where lies hope? A Schumpeterian analysis
      • Shippey on bureaucracy
      • Shamans!
      • Christianity ought to be the warmest and most pers...
      • Absolute abstractions can make people crazy
      • The harshness of selection for higher intelligence...
      • Why does God do things in such roundabout and indi...
      • The mass media versus religion: a neo-McLuhanite a...
      • The climate has cooled - for sure...
      • Attitude to the sexual revolution is the single mo...
      • Mega randomized clinical trials and their intrinsi...
      • Implications of the reality of Man's free agency
      • When words fail
      • The Good News, and the bad news
      • Is THIS BLOG part of the mass media?
      • Real understanding versus procedural pseudo-unders...
      • Asking the right questions about the mass media: p...
      • Defending a clear, strong and simple understanding...
      • Why is the mass media intrinsically anti-Good? Bec...
      • Why did mobile phones and social networking turn o...
      • More on Tolkien's niggler-status
      • The analgesic properties of tubular elastic bandages
      • Explaining eternal goodness - a speculative story/...
      • Theosis and free agency
    • ►  February (39)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile