modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, February 11, 2013

An evangelical Q & A - salvation, theosis, families

Posted on 10:26 PM by Unknown
*

Q - What do you want?

A - I come to bring you the Good News of Jesus Christ.

Q - Yeah, I know all that stuff. Look, why are you telling me this? You Christians are a nuisance - why can't you leave us alone?

If it happened, it happened two thousand years ago. If Jesus had really saved me from sin and death, why do I need to know about it? I'm saved already! What difference could knowing about it make?

A - That's a good question! (Pause...)

*

If the world was without sin and you were without sin, then I think you may be right. You probably would not need to know about Jesus to be saved by him. You could just live then die and collect your salvation.

But in a world of sin you would probably, for various reasons, fail to collect.

*

Q - Ha! Why would anyone fail to collect salvation, especially when they didn't have to work for it?

A - I'm glad to hear you say that - hold onto it! But the answer is that, by the time you die you might have decided that you don't need salvation, or that salvation is evil because God is evil - or you may be too interested in something else...

At any rate, by the time they die many people apparently don't want salvation - they don't want to live with God in Heaven.

So, if you don't want, you don't collect; and when you are offered salvation, ready made, work-done - like a wrapped package - you reject it.

To prevent that is why I need to tell you what happened 2000 years ago.

*

Q - But what am I supposed to do with this Good News?

A - Believe it. Really believe it. Regard it as reality. Live by it. Recognize that you were lost but now are found. Trust this reality - hold onto it. Cling to it exactly like a small child holds onto the fact of their Father's love, come what may. Reconize that you are never alone nor bereft.

*

Q - Yeah, yeah - but I need to know what to do, how to plan my life, what choices to make. Being saved is all or nothing, by the sound of it - I only have one choice to make. Suppose I am saved and know it. What then?

A - Have you heard of theosis?

Q - I'm not sure...

*

A - Salvation is binary: all or nothing: Heaven or Hell: Living with Christ, or rejecting Christ. Okay, so you are saved - but saved to what? That to which we are saved is determined by our choices. It's a hierarchy.

You understand? Salvation is binary, but the destination is multiple: Heaven has 'many mansions'. Theosis is about earning your place in Heaven, your position, your 'job' if you like...

*

Q - I still don't get why I need to know this!

A - You don't, if you are a child; but you do if you are not.

A child does not know it has a mother and father, or that that they love him. A child simply trusts...

*

Q - (Interrupting) But I'm not a child.

A - Exactly!

A child is saved - a child would not reject the salvation that Christ has won for him - a child wants to live with God in Heaven in that celestial family.

An innocent child simply trusts, loves, accepts... but an adult needs to know.

That's what makes him an adult. Innocence is beautiful and innocence is sufficient; but once the question has been asked, there is no going back.

*

Q - So if children are better than adults, why did I grow-up?

A - You mean why did God make you like you are? Well, an innocent child is intrinsically better and sure of salvation, but an adult is potentially better - it's theosis again.

*

Q - Ummm...

A - Look - things are more complicated for adults than children - but not that much more complicated. We can understand life in terms of families, of Fathers and Mothers and their children.

Family life is a the form of reality in miniature - and although earthly families are flawed, we can easily imagine them perfected.

In fact, we must know heavenly perfection otherwise we wouldn't realize that all earthly copies were flawed!

Q - Yes, I've read CS Lewis too...

*

A - Shut up and listen!

Salvation happens because we are God's children, theosis is growing-up and taking-on a role - in essence Father or Mother.

Put crudely, children don't need a 'job', they don't need to work; but grown-ups do.

*

A child does not need to make plans and strategies, life is binary; but to grow-up is precisely to make choices on the basis of priorities, and make priorities on the basis of reality.

God loves his children as children, and if they get no further then that is fine; but God wants his children to grow-up - which is a very hard and hazardous business.

Is that so difficult to understand about God? - All loving parents have the same attitude to their own children.

That is why you need to know.

(A - Stunned silence...)  

*
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Leftism cannot be subversive
    * New Leftism, post-mid-sixties Leftism, has been about shaping 'attitudes' - and this leads directly to the Thought Police For Left...
  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Free will entails a plurality of gods
    * By which I mean that free will makes each Man into something very much like the God of the philosophers: an unmoved mover, an uncaused cau...
  • How to make a Patagonian Shakespeare
    ...is the name of a new blog I am intending to work on - with a view to writing a book of that name. http://patagonianshakespeare.blogspot.c...
  • The bass part of music
    * The bass part seems to be liked - even though it is seldom noticed (some unmusical people seem unable to hear it). When the bass comes in,...
  • The Left isn't winning by having good arguments - it wins because people are punished for arguing against the Left
    * This is one of the things I find most frustrating, and increasingly frustrating: not so much that it happens, but that so many people cann...
  • Free will, the torturer and the tortured
    * If free will is real - as it is - then the extreme torturer (and nobody and nothing else) really is responsible for his choice to inflict ...
  • What do 'antipsychotics' do to people?
    * An interesting quote from Robert Whitaker's Anatomy of an Epidemic: magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of ment...
  • Free will implies/ entails pre-mortal existence
    * I find the following line of argument very convincing. Edited, and with bold emphases added, from pages 47-51 of  The God who weeps by Te...
  • Why remain a Church of England Anglican?
    * Given all my nasty (and well-deserved) criticisms of the Church of England, why am I a member? 1. I was baptized into into it, I attended ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ▼  February (39)
      • Christian Revival in China and Africa
      • "I want to believe in Christianity, but I just *ca...
      • The ridiculous beauty of blackbird song
      • Could IQ be made into an objective measure by usin...
      • Was Joseph Smith a "religious genius"?
      • When can bad news be 'good for...'
      • Relationship between intelligence and life history...
      • The reality of group selection - and the not-nicen...
      • Understanding the purpose of mortal life
      • What do I think about the doctrine of 'election'?
      • Does God constrain-himself, of is God constrained-...
      • What happens in a religious revival?
      • Was JRR Tolkien really a niggler?
      • Thanks to Lawrence Auster
      • Omnipotence bleg - and the problem of pain
      • Uglification
      • Modern sub-fertility may be a pathologically slow ...
      • Adoption as Sons of God - what does 'adoption' imp...
      • Philosophical pragmatism - Saint William James?
      • Sterling M McMurrin - Theological Foundations of t...
      • Notification of move from daily to intermittent bl...
      • Is it worth expending time and effort on 'educatin...
      • An evangelical Q & A - salvation, theosis, families
      • "Because there is no God, then I'm not responsible...
      • Separated at birth? Justin Welby & Walter the Softy
      • Deliberately misleading by choice of words is wors...
      • Why didn't the medical research bubble burst?
      • What - precisely - unblocked Tolkien's writing of ...
      • Explaining Trotter's clogs... a cold sweat moment ...
      • Ralph Waldo Emerson and Joseph Smith - the Greater...
      • Causes of the 'dysgenic' trend in intelligence: Th...
      • Does natural selection explain human intelligence,...
      • When is a State Church good (on the whole), and wh...
      • Same sex marriage and the counter-productive effec...
      • Who goes to Hell (for sure)?
      • A scientist's idea of Truth (in relation to theology)
      • Moral parasitism: when leaders act against the int...
      • The extreme depravity of modern Western leaders
      • What is the point of Mere Christianity? Pros and Cons
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile