modernCSLewis

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Proverbial wisdom

Posted on 10:08 PM by Unknown
*

Traditional wisdom is often in the form of proverbs; modern wisdom very seldom so - instead modern wisdom is in the form of abstract principles (such as 'rights'). 

On this basis, we ought to try and be less abstract, more proverbial. 

*

But proverbs are not abstractly coherent, the one with the other; and may suggest contradictory forms of advice - therefore proverbs must be embedded in narrative, in order that their specific application can be known.

For example, in trying to understand some difficult matter the proverb 'two heads are better than one' suggests we bring-in other people for advice and assistance; while the proverb 'too many cooks spoil the broth' warns that getting too many people involved in a job can sabotage it. 

Thus proverbs cannot work if they are regarded as detachable abstractions (proverbs are not laws). 

*

So, a proverb should refer to a story. 

The first 'two heads' example does not have an attached story, but the 'too many cooks' proverb was indeed linked to a nursery tale about cooks adding salt to soup, each adding the correct amount of salt without realizing that salt had already been added; and the story provides some guidance as to its applicability. 

*

For example, consider the proverb: "The wide world is all about you: you can fence yourselves in, but you cannot for ever fence it out."

This gets proper applicability from its literary context: 

"I knew that danger lay ahead, of course [said Frodo], but I did not expect to meet it in our own Shire. Can't a hobbit walk from the Water to the River in peace?"

"But it is not your own Shire,' said Gildor. 'Others dwelt here before hobbits were, and others will dwell here again when hobbits are no more. The wide world is all about you: you can fence yourselves in, but you cannot for ever fence it out."

And this, in turn, is embedded in the larger story about the childlike innocence of hobbits being protected by the 'parental' care of the Rangers, which leads back to the historical narrative of  Middle Earth, the fall of Arnor, the fall of Numenor and beyond.

*

So what does the proverb mean? "You can fence yourselves in, but you cannot for ever fence the world out."

It is not (for example) a denial of the validity of boundaries or fences, or an encouragement for hobbits to spread themselves widely; but a reminder of the big context of history, and the way that fences serve different functions at different times - and also that we may not understand what is going on in relation to fences.

The hobbits had been safe inside their self-imposed fence - until the Rangers departed, when the Shire was invaded by Ruffians.

The fence had value, but it had not been the fence that was protecting them. Yet the hobbits knew nothing of their guardian Rangers.

*

To understand a proverb you must know the story in which that proverb is located; you must know that the proverb is an aphorism of the unfolding of narrative history.

* 
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Attitudes and the Thought Police: opponents of Leftism cannot be subversive
    * New Leftism, post-mid-sixties Leftism, has been about shaping 'attitudes' - and this leads directly to the Thought Police For Left...
  • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
    * http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tolkien-and-lewis-which-was-most.html *
  • Free will entails a plurality of gods
    * By which I mean that free will makes each Man into something very much like the God of the philosophers: an unmoved mover, an uncaused cau...
  • How to make a Patagonian Shakespeare
    ...is the name of a new blog I am intending to work on - with a view to writing a book of that name. http://patagonianshakespeare.blogspot.c...
  • The bass part of music
    * The bass part seems to be liked - even though it is seldom noticed (some unmusical people seem unable to hear it). When the bass comes in,...
  • The Left isn't winning by having good arguments - it wins because people are punished for arguing against the Left
    * This is one of the things I find most frustrating, and increasingly frustrating: not so much that it happens, but that so many people cann...
  • Free will, the torturer and the tortured
    * If free will is real - as it is - then the extreme torturer (and nobody and nothing else) really is responsible for his choice to inflict ...
  • What do 'antipsychotics' do to people?
    * An interesting quote from Robert Whitaker's Anatomy of an Epidemic: magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of ment...
  • Free will implies/ entails pre-mortal existence
    * I find the following line of argument very convincing. Edited, and with bold emphases added, from pages 47-51 of  The God who weeps by Te...
  • Why remain a Church of England Anglican?
    * Given all my nasty (and well-deserved) criticisms of the Church of England, why am I a member? 1. I was baptized into into it, I attended ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (424)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (57)
    • ►  July (71)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (51)
    • ►  February (39)
    • ▼  January (45)
      • Who had the highest IQ: JRR Tolkien or CS Lewis?
      • In praise of the eccentric scientist
      • Tolkien's Father Christmas Letters - Audiobook rev...
      • Classical musicians who dominate public perception...
      • Question: How would someone find-out what "Christi...
      • How does more money make an organization worse - i...
      • How to make a sub-teen pop group
      • Is the exclusiveness of Christian denominations an...
      • Two basic existential stances on the afterlife
      • Harmonizing mainstream and Mormon theology - examp...
      • Robert Frost's influence on my life
      • What, specifically, must mainstream Christians lea...
      • What are Christian denominations? Ways of Christia...
      • *Note added: False alarm - didn't continue to work...
      • What is the most gratuitously bad drug class - my ...
      • The year ahead
      • Discerning truth and goodness from experience of f...
      • Roman Catholic polygamy - temporarily permitted in...
      • Proverbial wisdom
      • When did luxury set in?
      • The Book of Mormon as literature: unexamined impli...
      • Did modern man discover that truth is relative?
      • History must be cyclical *and* linear
      • What is a disease? Or, living in a madhouse
      • Evil at work: people Just Don't Get-It
      • An Inklings Reader?
      • Can love be bad? Lessons from the life of Charles ...
      • Bad language and 'Right Wing' blogging - another e...
      • "The essence of a religious mind..." The importanc...
      • How reasonable argument, based on false premises, ...
      • Ending-up on the wrong side of litmus test issues
      • Implications of Mere Christianity
      • How do we know if someone understands The Bible?
      • Whence cometh motivation? Why be brave?
      • Things are 'coming to a point' in the Church of En...
      • Loneliness
      • Prayer for Lawrence Auster
      • Fashion, therapy, enhancement, self-mutiliation......
      • Observing the Sabbath
      • We are dying from abstraction
      • An honest, Christian Anglican Archbishop
      • Units for permanent resistance - groups not organi...
      • Treatment v management in psychiatry - tranquilliz...
      • Self-remembering
      • Rowan Williams finally, publically abandons all pr...
  • ►  2012 (76)
    • ►  December (52)
    • ►  November (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile